The Role of the National Constitutional Courts in Protecting the National Constitution and Respecting EU Law at the Same Time - Through the Examples of the Decision No. 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB and Decision No. 32/2021. (XII. 20.) AB

Authors

  • Marcel Szabó University professor, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Law, Budapest; Justice at the Constitutional Court of Hungary, Budapest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47745/ERJOG.2024.01.01

Keywords:

constitutional court, primacy, reservation, recapture, national identity

Abstract

According to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the primacy of EU law has an absolute nature: the lowest rule of EU law can prevail over the highest (constitutional-level) rule of the Member States, while all questions of interpretation and validity of EU law fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU. Over the past decades, national constitutional courts have attempted in various ways to break through the wall of reasoning of the CJEU. In the context of the present contribution, the two most relevant decisions of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, namely Decision No. 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB and Decision No. 32/2021. (XII. 20.) AB, will be examined in the context of the relationship between national constitutions and EU law.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Marcel, S. (2024). The Role of the National Constitutional Courts in Protecting the National Constitution and Respecting EU Law at the Same Time - Through the Examples of the Decision No. 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB and Decision No. 32/2021. (XII. 20.) AB. Erdélyi Jogélet, (1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.47745/ERJOG.2024.01.01

Issue

Section

Studies