The Role of the National Constitutional Courts in Protecting the National Constitution and Respecting EU Law at the Same Time - Through the Examples of the Decision No. 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB and Decision No. 32/2021. (XII. 20.) AB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47745/ERJOG.2024.01.01Keywords:
constitutional court, primacy, reservation, recapture, national identityAbstract
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the primacy of EU law has an absolute nature: the lowest rule of EU law can prevail over the highest (constitutional-level) rule of the Member States, while all questions of interpretation and validity of EU law fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU. Over the past decades, national constitutional courts have attempted in various ways to break through the wall of reasoning of the CJEU. In the context of the present contribution, the two most relevant decisions of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, namely Decision No. 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB and Decision No. 32/2021. (XII. 20.) AB, will be examined in the context of the relationship between national constitutions and EU law.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcel Szabó

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.